首页> 外文OA文献 >Comparison of accuracy of lag screw placement in cephalocondylic nails and sliding hip screw plate fixation for extracapsular fractures of the neck of femur
【2h】

Comparison of accuracy of lag screw placement in cephalocondylic nails and sliding hip screw plate fixation for extracapsular fractures of the neck of femur

机译:con骨钉滞后螺钉置入和滑动髋螺钉钢板固定治疗股骨颈囊外骨折的准确性比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This study compared the accuracy of lag screw placement between extracapsular femoral fractures fixed with sliding hip screw plate systems and those fixed with cephalocondylic nails. It involved 75 retrospective radiographs of fractures fixed with either a cephalocondylic nail (32) or a sliding hip screw plate system (43). Postoperative anteroposterior and lateral radiographs of the hip were scanned using a digital X-ray scanner and measured using computer software. Measurements were conducted by two independent observers, and the radiographs were calibrated to correct for magnification. Accuracy of lag screw placement was determined by “tip apex distance,” described by Baumgaertner et al., and by the ratio method described by Parker. The mean tip apex distance was 24.0 mm in sliding hip screw plate systems and 21.1 mm in cephalocondylic nails. This was found to be statistically significant. Lag screw placement through cephalocondylic nails is more accurate and therefore has less chance of cut-out compared with sliding hip screw plate systems. There was no statistically significant difference using Parker’s ratio method because this method quantifies the direction of the screw rather than the depth of penetration.
机译:这项研究比较了滑动髋螺钉钢板系统和头con钉固定的股骨包膜外骨折之间拉力螺钉放置的准确性。它包括75例用头32钉(32)或滑动髋螺钉板系统(43)固定的骨折回顾性X线照片。使用数字X射线扫描仪扫描髋关节的术后前后及X线片,并使用计算机软件进行测量。由两名独立的观察员进行测量,并对射线照片进行校准以校正放大倍数。方头螺钉放置的精度由Baumgaertner等人描述的“尖端距离”和Parker描述的比率方法确定。滑动髋螺钉板系统的平均尖端顶点距离为24.0mm,而con骨钉的平均尖端顶点距离为21.1mm。发现这具有统计学意义。与滑动髋螺钉板系统相比,通过骨钉进行的滞后螺钉放置更准确,因此切开的机会更少。使用Parker的比率方法没有统计学上的显着差异,因为该方法量化了螺钉的方向而不是穿透深度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号